TEN DAYS TO THE BIP-110 WINDOW — MINER SIGNAL ZERO. SAYLOR AND ADAM BACK BOTH ON RECORD OPPOSED. MAIN CHAIN UNMOVED.

TFTC’s read Marty Bent covered July 12: with the mandatory-signaling window at block 961,632 roughly ten days out, miner signal on BIP-110 sits at zero for the current difficulty period. Cumulative backing has never cleared roughly 1% of hashrate since May. Saylor and Adam Back both went on record July 11 opposing the fork — Saylor calling it “a spam dispute turned into a consensus change,” Back telling proponents “Bitcoin respectfully says no.” The 55% UASF threshold isn’t being reached. The Technologist read: this is the consensus immune system working exactly as designed. The Capitalist wing (Saylor) and the Technologist wing (Back) publicly aligned on the same protocol call; the main chain stays unforked; the spam-dispute crowd gets a minority chain if they want one; the operator class watches the doctrine hold without exchange disruption. Miners are voting rationally with their fee revenue. Ordinals and inscriptions stay valid under Core rules. The precedent question — encoding a spam definition into consensus — is the real fight, and the doctrine is holding.